QUOTE(Jakeshorts @ Dec 6 2007, 01:14 PM) [snapback]440939[/snapback]
increases hypertrophy still doesn't equal increased anabolism. On a related note - downregulating myostatin through follistatin!?
Follistatin complexes Myostatin and antagonises Myostatin-mediated inhibition of myogenesis.Amthor H, Nicholas G, McKinnell I, Kemp CF, Sharma M, Kambadur R, Patel K.
Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London NW1 OTU, UK.
Follistatin is known to antagonise the function of several members of the TGF-beta family of secreted signalling factors, including Myostatin, the most powerful inhibitor of muscle growth characterised to date. In this study, we compare the expression of Myostatin and Follistatin during chick development and show that they are expressed in the vicinity or in overlapping domains to suggest possible interaction during muscle development. We performed yeast and mammalian two-hybrid studies and show that Myostatin and Follistatin interact directly. We further show that single modules of the Follistatin protein cannot associate with Myostatin suggesting that the entire protein is required for the interaction. We analysed the interaction kinetics of the two proteins and found that Follistatin binds Myostatin with a high affinity of 5.84 x 10(-10) M. We next tested whether Follistatin suppresses Myostatin activity during muscle development. We confirmed our previous observation that treatment of chick limb buds with Myostatin results in a severe decrease in the expression of two key myogenic regulatory genes Pax-3 and MyoD. However, in the presence of Follistatin, the Myostatin-mediated inhibition of Pax-3 and MyoD expression is blocked. We additionally show that Myostatin inhibits terminal differentiation of muscle cells in high-density cell cultures of limb mesenchyme (micromass) and that Follistatin rescues muscle differentiation in a concentration-dependent manner. In summary, our data suggest that Follistatin antagonises Myostatin by direct protein interaction, which prevents Myostatin from executing its inhibitory effect on muscle development.
PMID: 15136138 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activation on gonadotropin transcription and cell mitosis induced by bone morphogenetic proteins in mouse gonadotrope LbetaT2 cells.Takeda M, Otsuka F, Otani H, Inagaki K, Miyoshi T, Suzuki J, Mimura Y, Ogura T, Makino H.
Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama City 700-8558, Japan.
Involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma ) activation and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling in regulating cell proliferation and hormonal production of pituitary tumors has been reported, although the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated regulatory roles of PPARalpha and PPARgamma in gonadotropin transcription and cell mitosis modulated by pituitary activin/BMP systems using a mouse gonadotropinoma cell line Lbeta T2, which expresses activin/BMP receptors, transcription factor Smads, PPARalpha , and PPARgamma . In Lbeta T2 cells, BMP signaling shown by Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation and Id-1 transcription was readily activated by BMPs. A PPARgamma agonist, pioglitazone significantly reduced BMP-induced DNA synthesis by Lbeta T2; whereas the PPARalpha agonist, fenofibric acid, did not. In accordance with the effects on cell mitosis, pioglitazone but not fenofibric acid significantly decreased BMP-induced Id-1-Luc activation. Neither fenofibric acid nor pioglitazone affected activin signaling detected by (CAGA)9-Luc activity. Both PPARalpha and PPARgamma ligands directly suppressed transcriptional activities of FSHbeta , LHbeta , and GnRHR. Activation of PPARalpha and PPARgamma increased mRNA levels of follistatin, but did not affect the expression of follistatin-related gene. Thus, PPAR agonists not only directly suppress gonadotropin transcription and BMP signaling, but also inhibit the biological actions of activins which facilitate gonadotropin transcription through upregulating follistatin expression. In addition, pioglitazone increased BMP ligands mRNA, but decreased activin-beta B mRNA in Lbeta T2 cells. Collectively, PPAR activation differentially regulates gonadotrope cell proliferation and gonadotropin transcription in a ligand-dependent manner.
PMID: 17592024 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
This study confused me addmittedly... PPAR agonism increases mRNA levels follistatin but not the exression of it? So in other words.... it didn't increase follistatin... OR it increased it the way we wanted and it's good for your boys as well?
--------------------------------
but:
(by me at cuttingedgemuscle.com)
FASEB J. 2007 Sep 24.
Transgenic expression of a myostatin inhibitor derived from follistatin increases skeletal muscle mass and ameliorates dystrophic pathology in mdx mice.Nakatani M, Takehara Y, Sugino H, Matsumoto M, Hashimoto O, Hasegawa Y, Murakami T, Uezumi A, Takeda S, Noji S, Sunada Y, Tsuchida K.
*Division for Therapies Against Intractable Diseases, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan;The Institute for Enzyme Research, The University of Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan;Laboratories of Experimental Animal Science, Kitasato University School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Towada, Aomori, Japan;Department of Molecular Therapy, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan; ||Department of Biological Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan; andDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Myostatin is a potent negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth. Therefore, myostatin inhibition offers a novel therapeutic strategy for muscular dystrophy by restoring skeletal muscle mass and suppressing the progression of muscle degeneration.
The known myostatin inhibitors include myostatin propeptide, follistatin, follistatin-related proteins, and myostatin antibodies.
Although follistatin shows potent myostatin-inhibiting activities, it also acts as an efficient inhibitor of activins. Because activins are involved in multiple functions in various organs, their blockade by follistatin would affect multiple tissues other than skeletal muscles. In the present study, we report the characterization of a myostatin inhibitor derived from follistatin, which does not affect activin signaling. The dissociation constants (Kd) of follistatin to activin and myostatin are 1.72 nM and 12.3 nM, respectively. By contrast, the dissociation constants (Kd) of a follistatin-derived myostatin inhibitor, designated FS I-I, to activin and myostatin are 64.3 microM and 46.8 nM, respectively. Transgenic mice expressing FS I-I, under the control of a skeletal muscle-specific promoter showed increased skeletal muscle mass and strength. Hyperplasia and hypertrophy were both observed. We crossed FS I-I transgenic mice with mdx mice, a model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Notably, the skeletal muscles in the mdx/FS I-I mice showed enlargement and reduced cell infiltration. Muscle strength is also recovered in the mdx/FS I-I mice. These results indicate that myostatin blockade by FS I-I has a therapeutic potential for muscular dystrophy.
-------------------------------
much better:
the myostatin propeptide.
Biol Chem. 2002 Oct 25;277(43):40735-41. Epub 2002 Aug 22.
The myostatin propeptide and the follistatin-related gene are inhibitory binding proteins of myostatin in normal serum.Hill JJ, Davies MV, Pearson AA, Wang JH, Hewick RM, Wolfman NM, Qiu Y.
Department of Protein Chemistry and Proteomics, Wyeth Research, 87 Cambridge Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA.
Myostatin, also known as growth and differentiation factor 8, is a member of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily that negatively regulates skeletal muscle mass (1). Recent experiments have shown that myostatin activity is detected in serum by a reporter gene assay only after activation by acid, suggesting that native myostatin circulates as a latent complex (2). We have used a monoclonal myostatin antibody, JA16, to isolate the native myostatin complex from normal mouse and human serum. Analysis by mass spectrometry and Western blot shows that circulating myostatin is bound to at least two major proteins, the myostatin propeptide and the follistatin-related gene (FLRG). The myostatin propeptide is known to bind and inhibit myostatin in vitro (3). Here we show that this interaction is relevant in vivo, with a majority (>70%) of myostatin in serum bound to its propeptide. Studies with recombinant V5-His-tagged FLRG protein confirm a direct interaction between mature myostatin and FLRG. Functional studies show that FLRG inhibits myostatin activity in a reporter gene assay. These experiments suggest that the myostatin propeptide and FLRG are major negative regulators of myostatin in vivo.
-------------------------------------------------
Human Growth Factors & Cytokines
Recombinant Human Myostatin-Propeptide
Description :
Mature Myostatin is obtained by proteolytic processing of a biologically-inactive precursor protein, which contains an N-terminal propeptide of 243 amino acid residues. Myostatin Propeptide exhibits high binding affinity for myostatin and has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of Myostatin.
Over-expression of myostatin propeptide in mice resulted in large increases (up to 200%) in skeletal muscle mass, similar to those observed in Myostatin knockout mice. Recombinant Human Myostatin Propeptide is a 27.8 kDa protein consisting of 244 amino acid residues.
Catalog #:
120-12
Source :
E.coli
Stability :
The lyophilized protein is stable for a few weeks at room temperature, but best stored at -200C. Reconstituted Myostatin Propeptide should be stored in working aliquots at -200C.
Purity :
Greater than 98% by SDS-PAGE.
Endotoxin Level :
Endotoxin level is less than 0.1 ng per µg (1EU/µg).
Biological Activity :
Testing in progress.
AA Sequence :
MNENSEQKEN VEKEGLCNAC TWRQNTKSSR IEAIKIQILS KLRLETAPNI SKDVIRQLLP KAPPLRELID QYDVQRDDSS DGSLEDDDYH ATTETIITMP TESDFLMQVD GKPKCCFFKF SSKIQYNKVV KAQLWIYLRP VETPTTVFVQ ILRLIKPMKD GTRYTGIRSL KLDMNPGTGI WQSIDVKTVL QNWLKQPESN LGIEIKALDE NGHDLAVTFP GPGEDGLNPF LEVKVTDTPK RSRR
5µg$75 -------25µg$185--------1mg$4800
-----------------------------------
or the myostatin antibodies.
the antibody polyclonal:
Product Name
GDF8 antibody
Catalog Number
GTX30381
Product Description:
Anti - GDF8 polyclonal
Manufacturer & Mfg Part#:
Novus NB 100-281
Cross Reactivity:
This product recognizes human and mouse GDF8. Other species have not been tested.
Storage Instruction:
Store at 2-8 °Celcius.
Concentration:
1 mg/ml
Clonality:
POLYCLONAL
Tested Applications:
Immunohistochemistry, Western blot
Form:
Liquid
Specificity:
This antibody is specific for human GDF8.
Concentration Unit:
mg/ml
Immunogen:
A synthetic peptide, which represented a portion of human Growth Differentiation Factor 8 encoded within exon 3 (LocusLink ID 2660).
$ 2750 a mg.
---------------------------
---------------------------
by me at cuttingedgemuscle.com
related to PPARs:
Cancer Res. 2007 Jul 1;67(13):6512-9.
Are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors involved in skeletal muscle wasting during experimental cancer cachexia? Role of beta2-adrenergic agonists.Fuster G, Busquets S, Ametller E, Olivan M, Almendro V, de Oliveira CC, Figueras M, López-Soriano FJ, Argilés JM.
Cancer Research Group, Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Implantation of the Yoshida AH-130 ascites hepatoma to rats resulted in
a decrease in muscle weight 7 days after the inoculation of the tumor.
These changes were associated with increases in the mRNA content for both peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma and PPAR delta in skeletal muscle.* The increase in gene expression for these transcription factors was related to increases in the expression of several genes involved in fatty acid transport, activation, and oxidation. Tumor burden also resulted in increases in PPAR gamma coactivator-1 alpha gene expression and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4. All these changes in lipid metabolism genes suggest that a metabolic shift occurs in skeletal muscle of tumor-bearing rats toward a more oxidative phenotype. Formoterol treatment to tumor-bearing rats resulted in an amelioration of all the changes observed as a result of tumor burden.
Administration of this beta(2)-adrenergic agonist also resulted in a decrease in mRNA content of muscle PPAR alpha, PPAR delta, and PPAR gamma, as well as in mRNA levels of many of the genes involved in both lipid and mitochondrial metabolism. All these results suggest an involvement of the different PPARs as transcription factors related with muscle wasting and also indicate that a possible mode of action of the anticachectic compound formoterol may involve a normalization of the levels of these transcription factors.
J Med Genet. 2007 Sep;44(9):e88.
New PPARG mutation leads to lipodystrophy and loss of protein function that is partially restored by a synthetic ligand.Lüdtke A, Buettner J, Schmidt HH, Worman HJ.
Departments of Medicine and of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
PURPOSE: Familial partial lipodystrophy caused by mutations in the PPARG gene is characterised by altered distribution of subcutaneous fat, muscular hypertrophy and symptoms of metabolic syndrome. PPARG encodes peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma, a nuclear hormone receptor playing a crucial role in lipid and glucose metabolism and in several other cellular regulatory processes. METHODS: PPARG was screened for mutations by direct sequencing in two patients with lipodystrophy, one unaffected family member and 124 controls. Body composition was examined in affected patients, and they were investigated for abnormalities in laboratory results. Functional analysis of the mutant protein was assessed by determining transcriptional activity and possible interference with the wild-type protein. RESULTS: In two patients with familial partial lipodystrophy, we identified a nucleotide substitution in the PPARG gene. This mutation results in the substitution of aspartate by asparagine at residue 424 (D424N) in the ligand-binding domain of PPARgamma. The unaffected family member and all 124 controls did not carry this mutation. D424N PPARgamma had a significantly lower ability than wild-type PPARgamma to activate a PPARgamma-stimulated reporter gene, but did not exert a negative effect on the wild-type protein. Partial activation of D424N PPARgamma was achieved in the presence of the agonist rosiglitazone. CONCLUSION: We report a new PPARG mutation, D424N, which is located in the ligand-binding domain of the protein and leads to familial partial lipodystrophy. D424N PPARgamma exhibited a loss of function, which was partially restored by adding the PPARgamma agonist rosiglitazone, suggesting possible treatment potential of this agent.
Neurology. 2007 Feb 27;68(9):677-83.
Muscle and nerve pathology in Dunnigan familial partial lipodystrophy.Spuler S, Kalbhenn T, Zabojszcza J, van Landeghem FK, Ludtke A, Wenzel K, Koehnlein M, Schuelke M, Lüdemann L, Schmidt HH.
Muscle Research Group, Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty of the Charité, Berlin, Germany.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize muscle and nerve pathology in Dunnigan familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD). METHODS: We used conventional histology, immunohistochemistry, messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, gene sequencing, and clinical studies of 13 patients with neuromuscular involvement. RESULTS: The clinical findings consisted of muscle hypertrophy (12/13), severe myalgias (9/13), and multiple nerve entrapment syndromes (8/13). Skeletal muscle histology demonstrated marked Type 1 and 2 muscle fiber hypertrophy and nonspecific myopathic changes, whereas numerous paranodal myelin swellings (tomacula) were found in sural nerve biopsies. We found that myostatin mRNA expression was reduced in patients with FPLD vs controls. We sequenced the myostatin gene in our subjects, but found no mutations. We then investigated whether or not SMAD, the intracellular mediator of myostatin signaling, might be impaired in patients with FPLD. We found that in FPLD muscle, a large number of SMAD molecules adhered to the nuclear membrane and were not found within the nucleus, compared with normal muscle or muscle from a patient with a non-FPLD lamin A/C disease. CONCLUSION: The myopathy and neuropathy associated with Dunnigan familial partial lipodystrophy are distinct from other lamin A/C disorders. We hypothesize that the lipodystrophy-associated mutation interferes with SMAD signaling, linking this type of lipodystrophy to the phenotypically similar myostatin deficiency.
----------------------------------
see the hypertrophy image at:
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0021-...ttext&tlng=------------------------------------
------------------------------------
*by me at mindandmuscle:
PPAR Delta agonism, muscle atrophy.
http://www.mindandmuscle.net/forum/index.p...c=31355&hl=J Physiol. 2007 Aug 15;583(Pt 1):381-90.
PPARdelta agonism induces a change in fuel metabolism and activation of an atrophy programme, but does not impair mitochondrial function in rat skeletal muscle.Constantin D, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Layfield R, Tsintzas K, Bennett AJ, Greenhaff PL.
Centre for Integrated Systems Biology and Medicine, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
PPARalpha agonism impairs mitochondrial function, but the effect of PPARdelta agonism on mitochondrial function is equivocal. Furthermore, PPARalpha and delta agonism increases muscle fatty acid oxidation, potentially via activation of FOXO1 signalling and PDK4 transcription. Since FOXO1 activation has also been suggested to increase transcription of MAFbx and MuRF-1, and thereby the activation of ubiquitin-proteasome mediated muscle proteolysis, this raises the possibility that muscle fuel selection and the induction of a muscle atrophy programme could be regulated by a single common signalling pathway. We therefore investigated the effect of PPARdelta (delta) agonist, GW610742, administration on muscle mitochondrial function, fuel regulation, and atrophy and growth related signalling pathways in vivo. Twenty-four male Wistar rats received vehicle or GW610742 (5 and 100 mg per kg body mass (bm)) orally for 6 days. Soleus muscle was used to determine maximal rates of ATP production (MRATP) in isolated mitochondria, gene and protein expression, and enzyme activities. MRATP were unchanged by GW610742. Muscle PDK2 and PDK4 mRNA expression increased with GW610742 (100 mg (kg bm)(-1)) compared to vehicle (P<0.05), and was paralleled by a twofold increase in PDK4 protein expression (P<0.05). The activity of beta-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase increased with GW610742 (P<0.05). Muscle MuRF1 and MAFbx mRNA expression was increased by GW610742 (100 mg (kg bm)(-1)) compared to vehicle (P<0.05), and was matched by increased protein expression (P<0.001), whilst Akt1 protein declined (P<0.05). There was no effect of GW610742 on 20S proteasome activity and mRNA expression, or the muscle DNA: protein ratio. GW610742 switched muscle fuel metabolism towards decreased carbohydrate use and enhanced lipid utilization, but did not induce mitochondrial dysfunction. Furthermore, GW610742 initiated a muscle atrophy programme, possibly via changes in the Akt1/FOXO/MAFbx and MuRF1 signalling pathway.
now i ampursuing, direct ways to increasing AMPK activity (but only at adipocytes).
AT least PPARs Alpha and Delta, raises suspicions in me.
what do you think ?, in the same dish; Myostain, Follistatin, Activin, PPARs, Beta2 Adrenergic agonists, PDK4.
----------------------------
----------------------------
Muscle Nerve. 2005 Jan;31(1):34-40.
Loss of myostatin expression alters fiber-type distribution and expression of myosin heavy chain isoforms in slow- and fast-type skeletal muscle.Girgenrath S, Song K, Whittemore LA.
Wyeth Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, 87 Cambridge Park Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140, USA.
Myostatin (Mstn) is a member of the transforming growth factor-beta family that negatively regulates skeletal muscle mass. Mstn knockout mice have greater skeletal muscle mass than wild-type littermates. We investigated the effect of Mstn on fiber type by comparing adult muscles from the murine Mstn knockout with wild-type controls. Based on myofibrillar ATPase staining, the soleus of Mstn knockout mice displays a larger proportion of fast type II fibers and a reduced proportion of slow type I fibers compared with wild-type animals. Based on staining for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity, a larger proportion of glycolytic fibers and a reduced proportion of oxidative fibers occur in the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) of Mstn knockouts. These differences in distribution of fiber types are accompanied by differences in the expression of myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms. In both Mstn knockout soleus and EDL, larger numbers of faster MHC isoforms are expressed at the expense of slower isoforms when compared with wild-type littermates. Thus, the absence of Mstn in the knockout mouse leads to an overall faster and more glycolytic muscle phenotype. This muscle phenotype is likely a consequence of developmental processes, and
inhibition of Mstn in adults does not cause a transformation to a more fast and glycolytic phenotype. Our findings suggest that myostatin has a critical role in regulating the formation, proliferation, or differentiation of fetal myoblasts and postnatal fibers..