http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascia
http://www.fasciaresearch.com/
So one thing I've had a hard time reconciling in my physical rehab is some personal experiences with my knowledge of skeletal muscles. For example, at Christmas I sat around with family and didn't do much, and after a day of that I felt like my knee pain was back to the degree it was several months previous and I as a whole, felt very oddly stiff, sort of like being constrained by a straightjacket or something. Two days later I went swimming, and the movement resolved that and made me feel much more "loose" and pain free again. Yet from a skeletal muscle perspective I can find little to explain this, and it has bore out in numerous other situations for me as well. Another example: places of stiffness/tension that are relieved with a sensation of heat after massage or movement. Which doesn't make much sense from a muscle perspective... ischemia would be noticeable and there should be a lactic acid burn in there somewhere as well. Yet this corresponds nicely with histamine and fascia. Or how massage of the upper quad and glute areas quickly and reliably relieves my knee pain which seems to correlate with noticeable ITB tightness-- before learning that little trick, I had difficulty walking more than 5 minutes without incurring knee pain in the wake of my injuries.
So, one thing lead to another, and I was researching the concept of "myofascial knots"... hippie bullshit, or is it actually relevant? Turns out the fascia is a layer of connective tissue that runs under the skin, and around most muscles and organs. It has muscle-like properties in that it can contract and relax, and has been shown to be involved in the biomechanics of movement and stuff like lower back pain. No, it's not going to bench press a car, but the strength of fascia appears to be very relevant.
But where fascia differs from muscle is in its adaptability. It can change composition very quickly, to be either fundamentally stiffer or allow for a greater range of motion. And its composition and the direction its fibers are in is also relevant-- if stressed in too many directions too quickly, or allowed to be sedentary and underused for too long, the fibers can essentially form a laminate with restricted strength and motion.
In muscle, epinephrine enhances contraction... acetylcholine enhances relaxation. In fascia, EPI/ACh have no effect, and instead histamine enhances contraction, and nitric oxide / estrogen enhance relaxation.
In muscle, microtears and their subsequent repairs enhance strength. In fascia, stretching along a certain axis of movement enhances strength in that axis.
In muscle, quick movements require very fast fiber recruitment and contraction. In fascia, very fast movements relax it and let the muscle do the work. Another nifty tidbit is they contract in response to a real or perceived threat / stress -- sort of like a minor layer of armor under the skin.
Additionally, the fascia respond unusually well (relative to muscle) to mechanical movement. It may be that massage then works primarily on the fascia, and indirectly on muscles, by relaxing the fascia, allowing for plastic changes in its elasticity, and thereby releasing the muscle from its "straightjacket" (a study I read actually used that term, which was very interesting as that was what came to mind in regards to my personal experience before learning all this shit). Other theories also suggest involvement in acupuncture.
All interesting stuff. But where it gets more complex is in how it plays in tandem with muscles in regards to injury. If the muscle is injured, through some mechanism (histamine?) my understanding is the fascia contracts around it to support the muscle while it heals. One study on lower back pain suggested if that output signal from the muscle was "corrupted" (though I'm uncertain as to what they meant by that, or by what mechanism), this would in turn lead to aberrant behavior in the fascia possibly making some sort of evil pain-filled feedback loop between the muscle and fascia. And this may also be why the effects of massage can be so temporary-- whatever triggered the fascia to contract (injury?) is still generating that signal, so after temporary release it'll go back to that contracted state.
So assuming the injury to the muscle (or whatever) gets healed, it may be possible this made the fascia be contracted too long, at which point the composition changed to be more rigid and less flexible. And that can be a problem in that the restricted range of motion and lack of fascia contraction in larger coordinated movements incur further injury and pain. So, as the Wiki article notes, interrupting the contraction long enough then allows it to revert to its normal state.
Which probably just seems like a giant ad for yoga or something; "lengthen and strengthen" indeed. Anyway, I can't guarantee everything I assembled above is perfectly accurate (especially my speculation) but perhaps it might be relevant to some of you.
My even more extreme speculation is that like facial expression and emotion, fascia throughout the body directly affect the body and mind in a two way process. For example, with facial expressions, if you're sad, you make a sad a face characterized by specific muscle activation. Yet if you manually activate those same muscles the limbic system, in its infinite stupidity, actually starts to generate the emotion of sadness, even if you weren't sad to begin with. On a bright note, that works for forced smiling as well. So, if the fascia respond and contact to pain, injury, and possible threats, then perhaps contracted fascia (due to posture, injury, etc) also enhance the perception of pain or anxiety / threat scanning. In fact, the Ruffini ending is supposed to be able to inhibit sympathetic nervous system activity and responds to the skin sensation of being relaxed / stretched. From an evolutionary perspective this makes sense, as you'd want to be extra vigilant if you were injured and healing and therefore weakened-- getting twitchy in that state and not getting eaten by a roving bear (which are godless, rampaging killing machines as you well know) is an advantageous trait that could be passed on. But that's enough theoretical masturbation for now.
As an analogy, what kept popping into my mind was the T-X's liquid metal mimetic skin from Terminator 3. Which I'm sure is even worse of an analogy than a "series of tubes" for the internet and makes ScottL cry in his sleep. But if that wasn't a good excuse for a mental image of Kristanna Lokken, I don't know what is.
usually resolve quickly with light massage, which to me makes it seem A) related to contraction/increased tone and 